Archive for the 'Software Reviews' Category

Adventures in Linux

This weekend, on a whim, I decided to install Ubuntu Linux onto my laptop. Previously, when I tried Ubuntu on my desktop, it worked, but was a real pain to use; it seemed like on every hand there was some new driver issue or problem to deal with, each of which would take the better part of an evening to fix.

On my laptop, it’s the complete opposite. Ubuntu has been an absolute joy to use. It’s even been able to do stuff that I would have thought impossible for this older-model Toshiba. For example, it’s capable of running Beryl, an awesome 3D desktop program, even though the laptop has a pitiful video card. Here’s an example of what Beryl can do on a system with a good video card:

On mine, it’s not nearly as smooth, but it still works pretty well.

Anyways, I guess the lesson here is: Ubuntu is a lot better on older, more common hardware than on Franken-PC’s like my desktop. And when Linux is working properly, it can be a lot of fun.

Microsoft Word is a Terrible Product

I HATE Word. It’s a bizarre franken-product, somewhere between an honest-to-goodness text editor (like emacs, vim, or even Notepad) and an honest-to-goodness desktop publishing program (like InDesign, QuarkXPress, or even Microsoft Publisher), which only succeeds at being bad at both text editing and desktop publishing.

Now, I’m not a master designer, but I do know my way around a few design tools. For example, in every competently designed desktop publishing program, you can drag out “guides,” little colored lines that do not print but which mark, say, the center of the page, or the left margin, or any other given point on the page. It acts like the straight edge of a ruler, so that you can make sure you’re getting everything lined up properly. Word either does not have this basic feature, or it is buried deep in Microsoft’s terrible user interface.

And on the other hand, it’s not a good text editor. If you ever try to write a program or a web page in Word, you will quickly learn that this is a huge mistake. Word “helpfully” autocorrects your quotation marks with “smart quotes,” which, while nice enough if you’re writing a letter, aren’t recognized as quotation marks by compilers or browsers.

In fact, the only thing Word seems to be actually good for is writing and sending letters, especially using mail merge. But most letters and memos are being sent by email now. While hand-written personal letters are still being sent, typed paper letters and memos are a dying breed (and good riddance!). The vast majority of typed letters are some kind of mass mailing–usually junk mail.

The only other thing that I can think of is academic papers, since there are strict requirements on the “right way” to indent and italicize and double space your documents. But in the real word, almost all of what people use Word to do, they could do better with another program.

The thing that reminds me of my hatred is that today, I am forced to use Word to write something for work. I worked on a database for my employer. and now I need to write documentation for it so that people other than me can use it. I would use InDesign, but I need something that can be revised in the future, and only one of the computers at work has InDesign. All of the computers have Word, and everyone sort of knows how to use Word, so I’m stuck with it.

(Now, Microsoft, if you had just made pictures in Word work right, you could have spared the world this rant against your product. When I move a picture to within two inches from the top of the page, it should not immediately jump up to meet the edge of the page. The picture should stay where I put it, or at the very least, move from the edge of the page when I drag it or use the arrow keys. Grr.)

So, no, I’m not planning to buy Office 2007 just yet. How about you?

The Future of the Newspaper

World News Page When I first heard about the New York Times Reader, I thought: “That’s stupid. Why would I want that when my RSS feeds are so much more efficient?” But today, I finally tried it, and it’s amazing.

The NYT Reader is a bit of software available from the Times website. When you run the program, it downloads all of the day’s news onto your computer. Each section–like World, U.S., Business, or Opinion–has a page that lists the relevant headlines for that section. When you click on a story, the reader lays out the information in a newspaper-like columnar format (3 columns at the default font size on my 1024×768-sized laptop, although it reconfigures based on screen size, so a larger screen would have more columns, rather than just wider columns).

Why use this instead of an RSS reader? RSS and the NYT Reader are two different tools with two separate purposes.

RSS is for consolidating lots of news sources into one place, letting you grab information from all over the blogosphere at once. With RSS, I find myself skimming through everything. Engadget and Gizmodo, for example, put out so much content each that I find myself glancing at the headline and the picture, and then skipping to the next story, often in under a second, only stopping to read when something catches my eye.

Article View The NYT Reader is a little different; it’s designed for browsing, not for speed-reading. I find that the New York Times reader is easier to go through at a slower pace, partially because the volume of information is so much lower than a fully-loaded RSS reader.

The other reason is design. HTML and it’s associated technologies are limiting when it comes to layout and graphics design. The Reader’s adaptive columnar layout would be difficult to implement on a web page. Decent fonts are currently impossible with HTML and CSS. Because there’s no cross-platform way for web developers to embed fonts in web pages, they are limited to less than a dozen standard fonts.

The Reader software bypasses these problems and lets the Times capitalize on its long experience with the newspaper format. The Times Reader uses an easy-to-read font and maintains the easy-to-read column lengths. It can scale the fonts to a larger or smaller size, and continues to look attractive even at the largest font sizes. There are no scroll bars anywhere; if you article goes beyond one page, just push the down arrow to bring up the next page. To move to the next article, just hit the right arrow.

You can also easily save or print articles–which print as beautifully as they appear on the screen–and you can highlight and make notes on individual articles. There’s even a “News In Pictures” view that displays a slide show of the pictures of the day; click on a picture, and you can read the associated article.

The only downside: This program requires Microsoft .Net version 3. If you don’t already have this installed, the Reader Installer will go ahead and download it for you, but this process will take a long time. Fortunately, you only have to install it once. From then on, it’s smooth sailing.

The New York Times Raeder an absolutely beautiful program, exceptionally well-designed. I only wish my local paper, the Spartanburg Herald-Journal, had a similar service. But since the H-J is a NYT affiliate, there is yet hope!

In the future, when the electronic newspaper finally supplants the dead-tree newspaper at the breakfast table, this is how the news will look.

ANTI-DISCLAIMER: I’ve received no money or incentive from the NYT or any of its affiliates to write this entry. I just think it’s a great piece of software you should try.

FireFox 2.0

The other neat thing that I’m playing with other than the aforementioned Google Reader is the Firefox 2.0 Release Candidate. The new version of Firefox is going to have some new features, the most prominent of which are these two: First, the search bar offers suggestions from Google about what it thinks you’re searching for. So, if you type “New York,” it will drop down a box with entries like “New York Times,” “New York City,” and “New York Daily News.”

The other, far more valuable feature is the built-in spell checker. In any text form–like the blog entry form I’m typing in right now–Firefox will scan for misspelled words and underline them in red, just like in Word. This will (hopefully) prevent me from releasing blog entries with horrid spelling problems. That is very convenient.

I’ve encountered no problems with this version of Firefox yet, so hopefully version 2.0 will be released very soon.

To: Microsoft Re: Laptop Power Settings

OK, seriously guys. Why on earth would you want a laptop to hibernate by default when you close the screen?

Am I the only one who wants my computer to run while the screen is closed? If I’m running a spyware/virus scan, or even just trying to get to the USB port on the back of my machine, I don’t want the computer to take a nap.

Fortunately, it’s easy to correct this annoying behavior. Just go to the Power Options in the Control Panel, go to the Advanced tab, and change the drop down under “When I close the lid of my portable computer” to “Do Nothing.”