Archive for the 'Politics' Category

Killer Robots

SWORDSMetafilter links to a story about the first armed robots in Iraq. They are referred to as “SWORDS,” or “Special Weapons Observation Reconnaissance Detection System.” According to Thomas Killion, Chief Scientist of the U.S. Army, in an interview with CNET’s News.com, over the next few years, these robots will become more and more autonomous.

A lot of the systems today are tele-operated. That means a soldier has to spend all of his time essentially controlling a system, in terms of things like PackBot and so on. We want to get away from burdening soldiers in that way, and the work that we’re doing largely in support of the FCS program is demonstrating semiautonomous vehicles where they can do a lot of planning and execution on their own and they really only have to essentially call home to a soldier that’s controlling it when it needs additional guidance or is posed with a situation it doesn’t know what to do or it is at a point in the mission where it really needs further direction so it knows exactly what to do next.

I cannot begin to tell you how bad of an idea I think this is. We’re going to give robots guns and the autonomy to kill people.

Who’s responsible when one of these SWORDS kills some innocent Iraqi schoolchildren? What happens when one of our enemies figures out how to feed the SWORDS false instructions?

As a commenter in the Metafilter thread asks, Doesn’t anyone in the military ever consider unintended consequences?

ACLU Defends Christian Student’s Religious Expression

For too long Christian organizations have condemned the American Civil Liberties Union as anti-Christian and anti-religious freedom, accusing them of wanting “to remove any vestige of Christianity from public life.” This accusation is false.

What the ACLU actually opposes is the promotion of any particular religion by the government or by government-run organizations. In fact, their position on religion in public schools is quite balanced, and a position that Christians should be able to stand behind (my emphasis):

The ACLU defends students’ free speech rights in the public schools and defends students’ rights to pray in the schools. Additionally, whenever a teacher allows children to choose their own topics for an assignment (such as which book to read, which song to sing, or which topic to study for a presentation), students may choose religious themes - and the ACLU has protected their right to do so. Schools may also offer courses about religion or about the Bible or other religious works.

Public schools themselves should not, however, be in the business of promoting particular religious beliefs or religious activities. While it is permissible for public schools to teach about religion, it is not permissible to promote particular religious beliefs. While public schools should not be leading children in prayers or religious ceremonies, they should be respectful of the religious beliefs of students. Further, public schools should protect children from being coerced by others to accept religious (or anti-religious) beliefs. Public schools should seek to create an environment conducive to learning by all students and not act as vehicles proselytizing for religious or anti-religious beliefs.

The ACLU believes that the religious education of children should be directed primarily by parents, families, and religious communities - and not the public schools.

This isn’t just rhetoric. For example, in 2004, the ACLU sued a school for censoring a student’s yearbook entry which contained bible verse.

But you’ll never hear a pastor talk about how the ACLU defended religious liberty, will you?

Right now, the front page of the ACLU web site prominently displays a Bible verse.

But of course, the ACLU is an evil organization bent on destroying America’s Christian culture, right?

Enough already.

The ACLU says that the government and the schools shouldn’t be trying to influence your kid’s–or your–religious beliefs. That’s what the separation of church and state is all about. Why would you want the government telling you what to believe?

Christians: Stop attacking the ACLU. You’re only hurting people trying to protect your religious liberty.

UPDATE: Further investigation turns up “The ACLU Fights for Christians,” a collection of news links demonstrating that the ACLU fights for–and not against–Christians. For example: The ACLU defends a girl who wants to sing “Awesome God” at a school talent show, ACLU demands that a county put up a Christmas tree, and the ACLU helps free a street preacher from prison.

Attention: People Planning to Vote for Guiliani

You need to see this. Click on the video of the sidebar on the right.

Guiliani is running on his leadership during 9/11. The firefighters in the New York Fire Department strongly oppose him, and this video explains why. It’s worth 12 minutes of your time.

McCain’s “Dean Yell”

I swear, the man who talks before McCain sounds as nuts as Michael Savage.

I know I won’t be voting for him.

On Traditional Marriage

I found a new favorite quote about gay marriage today:

Throughout history, marriage has formed the cornerstone of human society, and we experiment with that institution at our own peril.

Of course, throughout history, it’s more common to find societies where men take multiple wives. I don’t see why we need to redefine that part of marriage.

Also, most marriages were arranged by elders to establish economic liaisons between families. And the family of the bride was usually prepared to pay the family of the groom a healthy amount to take her off their hands.

Now the liberals are trying to shove this whole monogamous marriage for romantic love fad down our throats. I’m a real conservative. I want six wives chosen by my dad, and I want each one to come with a free donkey.

“Why We Banned Legos”

The National Review Online has an interesting article about why an after-school program (temporarily) banned Legos from their classroom:

“The children were building their assumptions about ownership and the social power it conveys — assumptions that mirrored those of a class-based, capitalist society — a society that we teachers believe to be unjust and oppressive.”
. . .
“As we watched the children build, we became increasingly concerned.”

Mm-hmm. As a result of this concern, the teachers banned Legos while they discussed with each other and the 5-9 year old children a new social order for their Legotown. (Seriously, they call it that throughout their article.)

When they re-introduced the Legos, they decided to combat the “unjust and oppressive” capitalist society that was being developed in their classroom the only way that Communists know how: State Controls.

  • All structures are public structures. Everyone can use all the Lego structures. But only the builder or people who have her or his permission are allowed to change a structure.
  • Lego people can be saved only by a “team” of kids, not by individuals.
  • All structures will be standard sizes.

That last line’s pretty sad. All structures will be standard sizes. You may not build a sky scraper, an airport, a space ship, or any other interesting project. You may only be one of the faceless horde, with your box that is exactly the same size as everyone else’s boxes. Also, anyone can use your box, whether you want them to or not.

Way to take all the fun out of playtime guys.

Capitalism is prevalent because it works. It works really well. Ask the Soviets and the Cubans. Ask the Chinese, who are experiencing economic revival as they embrace capitalism. It doesn’t matter that not everyone gets and equal piece of the pie; in fact, society breaks when everyone gets the same thing. Instead of progress–better healthcare, more food, more clothing, advanced technology–you end up with lots of boring boxes of standard size.

(Via the Liberty Belles)

The Great Firewall of China

 

Free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny. The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality, but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism. Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.

-Sid Meier’s Alpha Centauri

“The Great Firewall of China” refers to China’s internet censorship program. Vast swaths of the internet are restricted from the average Chinese internet user, sort of like at Bob Jones University or your average Fortune 500 company. Only in addition to filtering things like pornography, violent content, and Homestar Runner, the Great Firewall of China blocks things like the BBC and references to the Tiananmen Square Massacre.

Of course, there are ways around any kind of censorship on the internet, such as the Tor Anonymity Network or a secure VPN connection.

Today I discovered a site that tests if any site is behind the Firewall. It’s running really slowly right now, because it’s been discovered by a number of popular websites today, but it works. It turns out that you can access this site from China, for now.

So, to my friends who may be enduring the oppression of internet censorship: In case you cannot access Tor’s homepage at http://tor.eff.org, I have saved a list of sites that you can download Tor software from at http://www.jdharper.com/tor/. Install it, and see what your authorities have been hiding from you.

Let freedom reign.

Not Again

idol.pngSome folks in Florida have erected a new 10 Commandments idol in front of the Dixie County courthouse.

*sigh* Here we go again. We can look forward to the ACLU suing Dixie County, to pastors around the country denouncing the ACLU and using this event as a demonstration of how “oppressed” Christians are in the United States, to the courts eventually deciding in favor of the ACLU, and to a few months of peace before some nutjob tries this again.

Here’s an interesting bit of trivia: A block of granite that size costs $20,000. How many people can you feed with $20,000? How many gospel tracts can you buy? How many missionaries could your church support for a year with $20,000?

This isn’t about spreading the gospel or doing any kind of good. It’s about building the egos of the donors and the Dixie County commissioners. Don’t believe me?

Former Commissioner John Driggers broached the subject on behalf of an unnamed county resident, asking whether the board was “bold enough” to allow the monument to be placed at the courthouse. After then-county attorney Joey Lander told the board he would defend any lawsuits stemming from the decision for free, commissioners voted in favor of allowing the project to proceed.

Joey Lander and John Driggers are using the ten commandments as a publicity stunt. Maybe, just maybe, this time conservatives won’t fall for it like they did the Roy Moore publicity stunt in 2003.

But who am I kidding?

The Right Way to End Poverty

Recently, I had the opportunity to go to a meeting called “Small World/Big Future,” in which Erik Peterson discussed seven major trends that he predicts will change the world between now and 2025. These trends include changes in demographics, improvements in technology, and rapid information distribution, among others.

During his speech, Mr. Peterson, senior vice president of the Center for Strategic and International Studies mentioned a commonly cited statistic: More than half of the world’s population lives on less than $2 a day. To me, this is almost unimaginable; how can you survive on so little?

So, clearly, much of the world is extremely poor. Organizations have developed to help people out of poverty by giving them money, clothes, medicine, and so on. While these are good and noble things to do, these organizations have failed to actually stop poverty. The problem can be summed up in the old cliché “If you give a man a fish, he eats for a day. If you teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime.”

You can’t just send food, water, medicine, and money; you have to help local people generate their own income. Many times, there are people in these developing nations who want to start a business, but simply can’t afford to because they can barely survive on their current incomes.

That’s where Kiva.org comes in. Kiva is a non-profit organization that helps connect people the United States and other wealthy nations with these entrepreneurs. Kiva lets you loan small amounts of money to these entrepreneurs to get their businesses started. (I do mean small amounts of money; some of these entrepreneurs only need $250 to get started.) Once they’re on their feet, they’ll repay you with interest. [ED-Thanks, Scott!]

This isn’t just charity; it’s an investment. And, frankly, investing in these nations is the most sustainable way to help them pull themselves out of poverty.

Revision To My Previous Statement

Previously, I said that I’d vote for any Democratic presidential candidate except Hillary Clinton. I need to revise that to “except Hillary Clinton or John Kerry.”

helpus_johnkerry.jpg

(Source)