Archive for the 'Culture' Category

On Traditional Marriage

I found a new favorite quote about gay marriage today:

Throughout history, marriage has formed the cornerstone of human society, and we experiment with that institution at our own peril.

Of course, throughout history, it’s more common to find societies where men take multiple wives. I don’t see why we need to redefine that part of marriage.

Also, most marriages were arranged by elders to establish economic liaisons between families. And the family of the bride was usually prepared to pay the family of the groom a healthy amount to take her off their hands.

Now the liberals are trying to shove this whole monogamous marriage for romantic love fad down our throats. I’m a real conservative. I want six wives chosen by my dad, and I want each one to come with a free donkey.

“Why We Banned Legos”

The National Review Online has an interesting article about why an after-school program (temporarily) banned Legos from their classroom:

“The children were building their assumptions about ownership and the social power it conveys — assumptions that mirrored those of a class-based, capitalist society — a society that we teachers believe to be unjust and oppressive.”
. . .
“As we watched the children build, we became increasingly concerned.”

Mm-hmm. As a result of this concern, the teachers banned Legos while they discussed with each other and the 5-9 year old children a new social order for their Legotown. (Seriously, they call it that throughout their article.)

When they re-introduced the Legos, they decided to combat the “unjust and oppressive” capitalist society that was being developed in their classroom the only way that Communists know how: State Controls.

  • All structures are public structures. Everyone can use all the Lego structures. But only the builder or people who have her or his permission are allowed to change a structure.
  • Lego people can be saved only by a “team” of kids, not by individuals.
  • All structures will be standard sizes.

That last line’s pretty sad. All structures will be standard sizes. You may not build a sky scraper, an airport, a space ship, or any other interesting project. You may only be one of the faceless horde, with your box that is exactly the same size as everyone else’s boxes. Also, anyone can use your box, whether you want them to or not.

Way to take all the fun out of playtime guys.

Capitalism is prevalent because it works. It works really well. Ask the Soviets and the Cubans. Ask the Chinese, who are experiencing economic revival as they embrace capitalism. It doesn’t matter that not everyone gets and equal piece of the pie; in fact, society breaks when everyone gets the same thing. Instead of progress–better healthcare, more food, more clothing, advanced technology–you end up with lots of boring boxes of standard size.

(Via the Liberty Belles)

Happy St. Patrick’s Day!

In honor of Saint Patrick’s Day, I present you with Patrick McLean’s Audio Essay on St. Patrick and How the Irish Saved Civilization. It’s about five minutes long, and well worth the listen.

What’s with this March Madness business?

I’ve never been a sports nut; I’d rather play with a computer or read a book or write something than watch people I don’t know throw a ball.

Near as I can tell, there are only a few reasons to watch professional sports:

  • You know one of the players. Given the immense number of people who follow professional sports, this seems unlikely.
  • For college sports, you went to the same school. But what about people like BJU students, who follow things like the NCAA tournament without having gone to the schools in question?
  • Your friends or family enjoy professional sports, and you use it as a source of small talk. But why sports instead of something meaningful interesting?
  • You have money riding on one of the teams. But many of the people that I know who enjoy sports to not engage in gambling.

So, seriously: Why do you people watch sports?

Where Has All My TV Gone?

It seems like a lot of my favorite shows are going on hiatus lately. Heroes, my current favorite TV show, is going to be gone for almost two months. House is going away for another couple of weeks. (Thanks a lot American Idol.) The Office is repeats for the next couple of weeks.

It’s just weird; why the lull in mid-March?

Oh well. It gives me time to catch up on Battlestar Galactica. Or, you know, do something productive.

A Plea to Communicators

Use fewer words.

In non-fiction communication–whether written or spoken–terseness is a virtue. Use as few words as necessary to communicate your point clearly, and no more.

This dictum is less applicable to fiction and conversation, but even here few will complain if you use fewer words.

At first it seems like we would naturally use fewer words. After all, writing more words seems like more work. But in reality, concise writing is more difficult. Why?

First, people do not think concisely. The first draft of most writing is full of clichés and lengthy sentence constructions that are the result of how we think. The remedy is revision: Go back and eliminate every unnecessary word. This applies to speeches as well as to writing: You should be practicing your speeches enough to know where to cut out extra words. (Also: Stick to your outline!)

Second, people learn bad habits in school. Instead of teaching how to write concisely, teachers demand that students reach a minimum quota for their papers. Naturally, the student wants to do as little of the tedious research work as possible, so he pads his paper with empty, meaningless words and phrases.

They teach that you should write by creating an outline–which contains most of the paper’s content–and then pad that to fill in the minimum space.

The remedy for this is for teachers to grade on content. Too often teachers grade primarily on grammar and meeting length requirements, because content is harder to grade than these objective factors.

Take the time to learn how English works. (I recommend The Writer’s Options: Lessons in Style and Arrangement by Max Morenberg and Jeff Sommers if you need someplace to start.) Revise everything you write at least once.

By writing more concisely, you improve your chances of getting your point to across to your audience.

Perspective

Absolutely amazing stuff.

The world is changing, fast.

Get ready.

Great Wordplay

I’ve always loved good metaphors and turns of phrase. I value clever lyrics in my music and have subscribed to blogs just on the basis of a well-written phrase.

I also grow weary of the constant flood of advertising in American culture.

So, I particularly enjoyed the latest post from the Church of the Customer blog. The authors, Ben McConnell and Jackie Huba have written books and blog entries and podcasts promoting the idea of companies pursuing personal relationships with customers.

A company that waterboards society and its culture with advertising is an organization that not only lacks imagination and creative skill but is probably incapable of creating or maintaining any kind of meaningful relationship.

Like a sociopath.

Waterboarding society with advertising. That’s exactly what’s it’s like. Do we really need ads over urinals and stamped on eggs?

By the way, the audiobook version of The Church of the Customer, is really well written and well produced, and it makes some great points for anyone aspiring to build their business. They show you how you can build a community of loyal customers who double as “citizen marketers”–people who tell their friends about your products/services. They obviously know what they’re talking about, because I’m marketing their book to you and I’m not being compensated by them in any way.

Incidentally, they haven’t put out a new podcast episode in months. This makes me sad; it’s one of the few business podcasts I still listen to.

The Future of the Newspaper

World News Page When I first heard about the New York Times Reader, I thought: “That’s stupid. Why would I want that when my RSS feeds are so much more efficient?” But today, I finally tried it, and it’s amazing.

The NYT Reader is a bit of software available from the Times website. When you run the program, it downloads all of the day’s news onto your computer. Each section–like World, U.S., Business, or Opinion–has a page that lists the relevant headlines for that section. When you click on a story, the reader lays out the information in a newspaper-like columnar format (3 columns at the default font size on my 1024×768-sized laptop, although it reconfigures based on screen size, so a larger screen would have more columns, rather than just wider columns).

Why use this instead of an RSS reader? RSS and the NYT Reader are two different tools with two separate purposes.

RSS is for consolidating lots of news sources into one place, letting you grab information from all over the blogosphere at once. With RSS, I find myself skimming through everything. Engadget and Gizmodo, for example, put out so much content each that I find myself glancing at the headline and the picture, and then skipping to the next story, often in under a second, only stopping to read when something catches my eye.

Article View The NYT Reader is a little different; it’s designed for browsing, not for speed-reading. I find that the New York Times reader is easier to go through at a slower pace, partially because the volume of information is so much lower than a fully-loaded RSS reader.

The other reason is design. HTML and it’s associated technologies are limiting when it comes to layout and graphics design. The Reader’s adaptive columnar layout would be difficult to implement on a web page. Decent fonts are currently impossible with HTML and CSS. Because there’s no cross-platform way for web developers to embed fonts in web pages, they are limited to less than a dozen standard fonts.

The Reader software bypasses these problems and lets the Times capitalize on its long experience with the newspaper format. The Times Reader uses an easy-to-read font and maintains the easy-to-read column lengths. It can scale the fonts to a larger or smaller size, and continues to look attractive even at the largest font sizes. There are no scroll bars anywhere; if you article goes beyond one page, just push the down arrow to bring up the next page. To move to the next article, just hit the right arrow.

You can also easily save or print articles–which print as beautifully as they appear on the screen–and you can highlight and make notes on individual articles. There’s even a “News In Pictures” view that displays a slide show of the pictures of the day; click on a picture, and you can read the associated article.

The only downside: This program requires Microsoft .Net version 3. If you don’t already have this installed, the Reader Installer will go ahead and download it for you, but this process will take a long time. Fortunately, you only have to install it once. From then on, it’s smooth sailing.

The New York Times Raeder an absolutely beautiful program, exceptionally well-designed. I only wish my local paper, the Spartanburg Herald-Journal, had a similar service. But since the H-J is a NYT affiliate, there is yet hope!

In the future, when the electronic newspaper finally supplants the dead-tree newspaper at the breakfast table, this is how the news will look.

ANTI-DISCLAIMER: I’ve received no money or incentive from the NYT or any of its affiliates to write this entry. I just think it’s a great piece of software you should try.

Amazing Depression Era Photos–In Color!

Before today, every image that I’d seen from the Great Depression was in sepia-toned black & white. This afternoon, The Daily Kos featured photos taken using Kodachrome, a durable color photography process invented in the late 1930’s. I’m stunned by the quality of the pictures.

fsa_il_chicago_cnw_roundhouse-smaller.jpg

cush22412_in_farm_scene.jpg

There are a couple of dozen photos there. Take a look; they’re amazing.